
As living in India this is one of the most important ethical dilemmas I would like to consider. This can be categorized under threat to native species. This Ganges dolphin was officially discovered in 1801 around the globe. But now their population is limited in the southern part of Asia mainly found in Ganga and Indus river tributaries. The Ganges river dolphin can only live in freshwater and is essentially blind. They hunt by emitting ultrasonic sounds. Their scientific name is Platanista gangetica, and they weigh around 330-374 pounds.
Now the question is how this single species is connected to all three environmental ethics? (land ethics, deep ecology and ecofeminism)
The first case according to Land ethics: which was developed by Aldo Leopold in his book “A Sand Country Almanac” in 1949. And he quotes “a thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise”. And the most important thing he says is we need to change from “conquerors of the land community to plain member and citizen of the land”. Technically land includes all biotic community so it even includes Ganges dolphin. Many people are still being conquerors by hunting Ganges dolphin and even poaching (illegal) takes place. And there is a lack of coordinated conservation plan, lack of awareness, and continuing anthropogenic pressure. So, this is totally against the principles of land ethics, we’re not respecting them, conserving them and we’re not changing into a member of the community where the dolphins belong. There is no sight of integrity, stability, and beauty.
The second case according to deep ecology: which was coined by Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess in the early ’70s. He said that “humans should respect nature and value the inherent worth of all life forms”. There are 8 important principles of Deep ecology and I would like to compare with the main ones. It says “humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital need” – but here dolphins are being killed for non-vital needs illegally. Another principle says “present human interference with the non-human world is excessive and the situation is rapidly worsening” – this is so true that we human beings are possessing the biggest threat to the dolphins. Bycatch which refers to dolphins caught in fishing nets accidentally, industrial, agricultural, and human pollution is leading to serious habitat degradation. Each year, 9000 tons of pesticides and 6 million tons of fertilizers are used in the vicinity of the river. This toxic chemical can directly harm them. Infrastructure is another major issue where dams were built and this led to the separation of species where it disturbs breeding cycle and migration. This all is due to excessive human interference which should be reduced and as the principle says “even the human population should be decreased” for the better world tomorrow. This is one of the most controversial statement. I believe there is no need for a decrease in population to conserve dolphins but a basic moral sense and awareness is required.
The 6th principle calls for an action “policies must, therefore, be changed” and the 8th principles call for commitment “humans have an obligation directly or indirectly to participate in the attempt to implement the necessary changes”. So, the positive side according to this each principle is there have been initiatives taken to protect and conserve the Ganges dolphin. The World Wild Fund – India works as guardians for Ganges dolphin and IUCN listed as endangered species, the government of India declared Ganges dolphins as the national aquatic animal in 2009, which means it should be protected in any case. The best part is this doesn’t come under shallow ecology. As there is a drastic change in policy and in India many people have started to think about the protection of these dolphins in recent times, so as the deep ecology suggests there is a redesign of society’s value to respect and value nature, independent of its use to humans.
The third case according to Ecofeminism: which was coined by Francoise D’ Eaubone in 1974 during the time of the cold war between America and Russia. It was also in the era of the beginning of feminism in general, environment consciousness, and debate of social and economical principles of society. In simple words, ecofeminism means women = nature. The basic idea of ecofeminism is to respect the life forms, avoid every kind of discrimination and domination, emphasize the importance of inter-relationships between humans, non-humans, and the earth, technology development should not be the main purpose and live in balance with nature to ensure the future. In the case of these dolphins, they’re being ruthlessly poached and killed, dominated, and oppressed by the human being in the same way women are. Childbirth considered a link between women and nature, so in the same way, the birth of new dolphins should be considered and appreciated. The hunting of dolphins is against the values and principles of ecofeminism so it’s time to respect all biotic living as well as women. In India, there were several movements related to ecofeminism such as the Narmada movement, Chipko movement, and Gandhian non-violent tradition which express equality, social justice, and environmental prevention. so, as living in the land of morals it’s important to even follow the ethics of ecofeminism.
“when you’re doing the right thing for the earth, she gives you great company
Vandana Shiva






